Masked and armed teens chased a
16-year-old down
CCTV cameras caught the horrific
moment Ed Bystander tripped and fell as he was trying to escape the gang in
![]() |
Violent Chattingham yobs caught on CCTV |
Jurors heard that as he lay unconscious in a shop doorway, one of them then struck him twice with a hammer.
Two of the mob who chased him on 13th March, 2020 were just 15 years old. One was brandishing the hammer, the other had a metal pole.
Five years after the attack, Beezelbub Smith and James Barklay have finally been brought before
Smith, of
Opening the case, prosecutor Sir St. John Grebe-Streebling told the jury that Mr. Bystander and his girlfriend were walking along Grott Street, Chattingham when they were confronted by a group of youths that had previously been seen loitering outside a nearby supermarket.
![]() |
Beezlebub Smith: GBH |
The boy fled but was chased by Smith and Barklay who were wielding the hammer and pole respectively.
One of the other gang members was even filming the unfolding incident, "doubtless for gratification", added Sir St. John Grebe-Streebling, and aggressively gesturing "come on" as he did so.
Mr. Bystander was finally cornered in a shop doorway by the six young thugs, who punched him to the ground in front of his terrified girlfriend.
"CCTV footage shows it was then that Ed was struck by Smith twice with a hammer," said Sir St. John Grebe-Streebling
"Mr. Bystander was by now unconscious and the gang then panicked and ran away. Not one of them attempted to assist Ed as he lay there. They left him for dead."
The teenager suffered severe bruising and multiple fractures to his limbs, a broken jaw and fractured skull, along with fractures to his right arm. After several operations the jury was told the now 19-year-old still has nerve damage and may never fully recover. Further surgery may also be required.
“It is only by the grace of God that we are not participating in a murder trial,” said Sir St. John Grebe-Streebling.
The jury were told that the victim had undergone several operations and that the now 19-year-old still has poor nerve function and may never fully recover. Further surgery may also be required.
![]() |
James Barklay: "it wasn't me mate..." |
He added, however, that on seeing the teen unconscious on the ground, he thought “blimey we’ve killed ‘im, let’s scarper.”
Sir St. John Grebe-Streebling said that the prosecution case was that “the defendants set out to cause really serious harm to a randomly selected victim and perhaps even kill, all just for fun”.
Sarah Golightly, barrister for the defence, stated that both defendants were truly sorry for their actions, despite having previous convictions for random, violent assaults.
“ADHD……abusive childhood…..deprived upbringing….drug problems…..behavioural issues……mitigating circumstances blah blah”, said Ms. Golightly, reading from a list of standard excuses.
Asked by his barrister how he felt about the incident, Smith said, “I don’t care ‘cos he ain’t me.”
“He ‘ad a pretty girlfriend an’ a nice phone an’ we were jealous, like, so I fort me an’ the lads would giv’ ‘im a kickin’, like, for bein’ a smug barsted,” before adding (at the prompt of his barrister) "er, yeah, I feel bad."
Smith and Barklay each denied causing GBH with intent as well as the alternative offence of causing GBH.
Barklay also denied violent disorder, an offence Smith had admitted.
Giving evidence, both maintained they had never intended any harm to be caused to Mr. Bystander that day, despite having weapons and beating him unconscious.
Asked why they had not helped their stricken victim as he lay unconscious in the shop doorway or sought assistance for him, Smith told the court “we fort we’d killed ‘im, so all we wanted to do was run away quick, like”
"We woz only havin’ a larf, like, y’know?” Barklay added.
Judge Maud Brobat-Bollard sentenced both Smith and Barklay to a 20-month youth rehabilitation order, a four-month tagged curfew and also ordered them to carry out 270 hours of unpaid work.
“In an ideal world I would sentence you both to ten years in prison without remission,” said the Judge.
“Unfortunately, Home Office sentencing guidelines currently prevent me from sending any violent offenders to prison because the jails are all full of Just Stop Oil protesters.”
“I fully expect to see both of you in this court again before long…”
In
the
real world, the trolls have decided to politicise a nasty story of psychopathic
behaviour, thus illustrating their own psychoses. In amongst the usual nut-job “hang
‘em high/deport” comments is the provocative and often personal abuse used by the right-wing
trolls – and all tolerated by the host in breach of its own comments guidelines.
A mild form of stochastic
terrorism…?
Comments:
Please note that we do not
moderate comments. However, we may edit or delete them, or manipulate the
voting on them in order to reflect our editorial policy.
Super Small Dick wrote:
Bring the
👍+28
Auntie Nartsie wrote:
No point wasting money locking shit like them up, charge the family for bullets
and a gun and shoot them ASAP
👍+123
Chad Grindr wrote:
I hope the victim can move forward in life despite his injuries and wish him
all the best.
Better not say anything about the perpetrators in this latest awful crime
carried out on our streets in case it upsets some deranged lefties.
👍+174
Neil Barse replied:
You are absolutely right as ever, Neil. Those deranged lefties are quite happy
to let violent criminals roam the streets to support their woke agenda of
positive discrimination.
👍+109
Gonads replied:
“Deranged lefties?” I presume by that you mean ‘anyone who does not share your
political views’. And what you most likely want to say is the usual twisted
right-wing supremacist rubbish that takes incidents like this and politicises
them. You usually have no such qualms.
👎-50
Grey Mondeo Man replied:
They have to believe (or pretend to believe) certain things about moderate
voices of any sort in order to justify their right wing extremism.
👎-51
Neil Barse replied:
You are correct about moderate voices Grey
👍+22
Chad Grindr replied:
You are absolutely right as ever, Neil. Lol, there is nothing wrong with genuine
moderate left wing opinions, because they are too civilised and can easily be
shouted down and cowed into silence.
It's those who argue against us, and are therefore far-left extremists, that are
the problem.
👍+15
Chad Grindr wrote:
Typical Labo*r soft sentencing guidelines. You know, the ones the Justice Secretary
has condemned herself!
👍+58
Neil Barse replied:
You are absolutely right as ever,
👍+109
Tornado Watcher replied:
The Sentencing Guidelines are created independently from government - you know,
how a free society is supposed to operate. The new Labo*r government has
expressed displeasure at them, but they do not directly control them.
To suggest otherwise is disingenuous.
👎-8
Grey Mondeo Man replied:
The guidelines considered under the Tories and agreed by the previous Conservative
government?
👎-26
Chad Grindr replied:
They are currently being implemented by Labo*r. The Tories are not in
government and so it is obvious that everything must now be the fault of Labo*r,
but nice desperate attempt at whataboutery.
Please stick to facts and telling the truth rather than clinging onto whataboutery
about other political parties not even in government all the time.
Thank you.
👍+19
Grey Mondeo Man replied:
You seem to be dismissing 14 years of the disastrous former Tory administration
as “all Labo*r’s fault”, and then accuse me of “whataboutery” when I suggest
that there are such things as legacy issues. A curious way to express yourself.
👎-12
Chad Grindr replied:
You mean expressing myself by daring to say the truth.
Yes, that certainly seems to upset deranged lefties.
👍+26
Neil Barse replied:
"A curious way to express yourself.”
That’s funny, coming from you, Grey Mondeo
👍+23
Chad Grindr replied:
Very true Neil, but please don't disturb Grey Mondeo Man at the moment. He is
very busy down voting any comments that upset him ;-)
👍+22
Gonads replied:
Either Chad and Neil are indulging in a sweet bromance or (more likely) it’s
just one right-wing troll with at least two fake IDs…
👎-78
Chad Barse replied:
At last, Gonads confesses the truth about himself before slinking away to stew
in his own UK-hating demented leftist bile. A bitter lonely insidious
individual who's mental instability is getting worse by the day, due to the
fact they fail to annoy anyone with their constant sea-lioning and self-contradictory
posting. Completely expected every time Gonads posts on here.
👍+102
Auntie Nartsie wrote:
We shouldn’t bother with the expense of trials. The vile cretins in this armed
gang should just be put in the stocks or better still - used for euthanasia
trials! These sick gang members mentality is ruining our society, their
fragrant disregard for the law is clear & they should be locked away for
life - never to see the light of day again if I had my way!
👍+206
Neil Barse replied:
Oh no, we can't possibly do that. Far better to keep the deranged lefties happy
and treat them with kid gloves, a gentle slap on the wrist will suffice and
then spend thousands upon thousands on rehab and psychological support to turn
their life of criminality around. Bless their cotton socks, their parents must
be oh so proud of their little darlings.
👍+40
Victor Laudanum replied:
Personally, I think their disregard for the law stinks.
👍+57
Gonads replied:
That reply is wasted on most of the trolls on here. “Fragrant disregard” – lol.
And as for due process and the Rule of Law – that’s just deranged leftie
thinking!
👍+2
Priceless87 wrote:
We don’t need woke lefty courts and criminal justice!!! Those thugs were all
guilty and shouldn't see day light again! They are the worst of the worst and
should have all be found guilty of attempted murder. They have been dragged up
with no morals, their family's should be ashamed and their parents have birthed
such demons but looking at their actions! They're probably just as bad and
should be jailed as well!
👍+254
Auntie Nartsie wrote:
Why are they being locked up here at OUR expense... send them back... OR
somewhere as far away as possible.
👍+179
Tornado Watcher replied:
“Send them back”? Back where? Why?
👎-54
Auntie Nartsie replied:
Who in
I really couldn't give a flying 'fudge'
This country needs to grow a pair... and any doo-gooders that want to support
them can be sent with them... good riddance.
👍+75
Tornado Watcher replied:
Where in the report does it say that the defendants were “forren illegal immigrant
criminals”? With surnames like “Smith”
and “Barklay” they don’t sound like “forren illegal immigrant criminals” to me.
Or are you suggesting that all crimes are committed by “forren illegal immigrants”?
👎-98
Chad Grindr replied:
Yet another deranged leftie. Probably a fake ID used by the same person behind Grey
Mondeo Man or Gonads or Victor Laudanum?
👍+67
Neil Barse replied:
You are absolutely right as ever, Neil. These deranged lefties are so desperate
they need to have multiple IDs to try and get their views across and monopolise
the agenda.
👎+80
Tornado Watcher replied:
Chad/Neil: you seem to have got your multiple IDs mixed up in your last reply…
👍-197
Neil Grindr replied:
At last, Tornado Watcher confesses the truth about himself before slinking away
to stew in his own UK-hating demented leftist bile. A bitter lonely insidious
individual who's mental instability is getting worse by the day, due to the
fact they fail to annoy anyone with their constant sea-lioning and self-contradictory
posting. Completely expected every time Tornado Watcher posts on here.
👎+102
Notasoviet Resident
wrote:
Comrades, dear Mr. Putin says for you to vote REFORM in next elections because
all other political
👍+18